翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Bancoult (No 1)
・ R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Bancoult (No 2)
・ R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p Rees-Mogg
・ R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p World Development Movement Ltd
・ R v Secretary of State for Home Affairs, ex p O'Brien
・ R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Doody
・ R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Fire Brigades Union
・ R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p Northumbria Police Authority
・ R v Sharpe
・ R v Shein
・ R v Shelembe
・ R v Shivpuri
・ R v Généreux
・ R v Hall
・ R v Hancock
R v Handy
・ R v Hape
・ R v Harbottle
・ R v Harrison
・ R v Hasan
・ R v Hauser
・ R v Hay
・ R v Headteacher and Governors of Denbigh High School, ex p Begum
・ R v Hebert
・ R v Henry
・ R v Hess; R v Nguyen
・ R v Heywood
・ R v Hibbert
・ R v Hinks
・ R v Holland


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

R v Handy : ウィキペディア英語版
R v Handy

''R v Handy'', () 2 S.C.R. 908, 2002 SCC 56, is the leading Supreme Court of Canada decision on similar fact evidence. The Court proposed what is known as the Handy test for determining whether past occurrences that resemble the crime can be admitted as evidence.
==Background==
The complainant went out drinking with her friends and met James Handy whom she had known for several months. They went home together and what began as consensual sex became violent.
Handy was charged with sexual assault causing bodily harm. The Crown tried to introduce evidence of Handy's history with his ex-wife which involved seven past sexual assaults on her. The trial judge allowed it.
The issue before the Supreme Court was whether Handy's history of violence with his ex-wife is admissible as evidence.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「R v Handy」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.